<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: more than meets my attention span.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightrotation.com/hss/2007/07/05/more-than-meets-my-attention-span/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightrotation.com/hss/2007/07/05/more-than-meets-my-attention-span/</link>
	<description>A steady diet of supreme nothing.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 06:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jong</title>
		<link>http://lightrotation.com/hss/2007/07/05/more-than-meets-my-attention-span/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Jong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hssxfer.wordpress.com/2007/07/05/more-than-meets-my-attention-span/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>i didn't understand all the (overall) praise for the film.  upon which, i thought...well, i'm a huge fan of the cartoon (and the die-cast metal figures...boo to plastic) - so i could be looking at the film from stubborn, purist teenage eyes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;but it was crap, except for a few moments, i.e. optimus prime's call to action, "autobots, let's roll out!"  otherwise, the moments were far and few between.  throughout most of the fight scenes, i thought...what's the point of the intricate CGI work - when michael bay can't hold his camera fuckin' steady?  i felt the same when watching "bourne ultimatum."  (i was disappointed to know that paul greengrass was returning to direct this installment, when i would've liked to have seen doug liman return from the franchise debut).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ugh, and the forced, cliche "human" sense of humor, i.e. the scene where the autobots surround shilah's character's house while he searches for the glasses...today's intergalactic robots apparently watch too many 80's sitcoms.  i could go on about "transformers." &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;another part of my childhood entertainment swallowed, chewed, and spit back to shit.  blah.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;god bless christopher nolan.  i wasn't even a batman fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t understand all the (overall) praise for the film.  upon which, i thought&#8230;well, i&#8217;m a huge fan of the cartoon (and the die-cast metal figures&#8230;boo to plastic) - so i could be looking at the film from stubborn, purist teenage eyes.</p>
<p>but it was crap, except for a few moments, i.e. optimus prime&#8217;s call to action, &#8220;autobots, let&#8217;s roll out!&#8221;  otherwise, the moments were far and few between.  throughout most of the fight scenes, i thought&#8230;what&#8217;s the point of the intricate CGI work - when michael bay can&#8217;t hold his camera fuckin&#8217; steady?  i felt the same when watching &#8220;bourne ultimatum.&#8221;  (i was disappointed to know that paul greengrass was returning to direct this installment, when i would&#8217;ve liked to have seen doug liman return from the franchise debut).</p>
<p>ugh, and the forced, cliche &#8220;human&#8221; sense of humor, i.e. the scene where the autobots surround shilah&#8217;s character&#8217;s house while he searches for the glasses&#8230;today&#8217;s intergalactic robots apparently watch too many 80&#8217;s sitcoms.  i could go on about &#8220;transformers.&#8221; </p>
<p>another part of my childhood entertainment swallowed, chewed, and spit back to shit.  blah.  </p>
<p>god bless christopher nolan.  i wasn&#8217;t even a batman fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

